Maybe a cost-benefit analysis should be made on the one hand and the other hand from the above paragraph. A very positive outcome for the other hand seems very plausible, thus very positive for the people and naturally not so positive for the 1%: the big money and big power.
Concerning the very important aspect in the debate about mass vaccination of healthy people with an adequate and non compromised immune system Prof. Dr. Theo Schetters claims that mass vaccination is unneeded because the population already has enough immunity. See the video with english subtitles:
Covid: Mass vaccination reckless and unnecessary says Professor Doctor Theo Schetters
The Belgian Flemish state broadcaster Vrt and other Flemish and Dutch “factcheckers” attact the thesis above of Theo Schetters by spreading partial and therefore misleading information. The Vrt poses on its webpage (only in Dutch) https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2021/01/13/check-in-deze-nederlandse-youtubevideo-wordt-onterecht-twijfel/ (translated to English) “No, most people are not immune for the coronavirus … How many people are immune for the coronavirus? About 14% of all belgians, according to a recent estimate of Sciensano.”. Nevertheless the immune system is much more than the above misleading reduction (to only specific immunity after immune reaction on covid itself) by the state broadcaster Vrt:
– Firstly: The immune system consists of an innate and adaptive component. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_system. In other words innate immunity does also exist!
– Secondly the mucosal immune system is the largest component of the whole immune system. The first interactions of SARS-CoV-2 occur predominantly with this mucosal immune system. It is probably the main reason why many people do not or hardly get ill from covid thanks to its IgA antibodies. And importantly almost all current vaccines hardly induce IgA antibodies because those vaccines focus on systemic injection, which predominantly induce circulatory IgG antibodies and, potentially, cytotoxic T cells: Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
– Furthermore people during their lifetime were plentyful exposed to other viruses and coronaviruses and their immune system learned from this exposure and acquired general immunity against coronaviruses. For example cross-reactivity of T cells.
– The fact that a large majority of people did not or hardly get sick from covid proofs beyond any doubt the thesis that a large majority of the population have already particular forms of immunity against covid.
Therefore Prof. Dr. Theo Schetters is correct concerning this very important aspect in the debate about mass vaccination of healthy people with an adequate and non compromised immune system, but the Belgian Flemish state broadcaster Vrt and other Flemish and Dutch “factcheckers” spread partial and therefore misleading information about this aspect by which they push the mass vaccination agenda.
Many established media for example omit the information that the vaccine effectiveness is observed only short-term en that the effectiveness and risks long-term and medium-term naturally are not observed. The VRT (Flemish state radio and television corporation) brought forward in 2020 even an “expert” that claimed that the one year development time of a covid vaccine offered the same quality as a normal average seven years back in the days. What a blatant lie because long-term and medium-term effects are simply not observable during one year development time. For example the new mRNA vaccines create high concentrations of its RNA in the human body. The eventual impact of those high RNA concentrations on the human cell DNA is not tested. This is properly explained from minute 50:00 in the video about the PCR test and the mRNA vaccines in the next paragraph.
The new mRNA vaccines (Phizer, Moderna, ...) are not tested on mutation (modification) of the human cell DNA which biochemically is a theoretical possibility. After all what is injected are viruslike agents (packages) that enter and use the cell plasma, around and in contact with the cell nucleus containing the human DNA, with sufficiently high mRNA concentration to create enough spike protein for a sufficient immune reaction. The following new, little tested risk-elements stand out:
– Viruslike agents that enter and use the cell plasma, around and in contact with the cell nucleus containing the human DNA.
– They use the cell plasma with sufficiently high mRNA concentration for a sufficient immune reaction.
– The potential conflicting interests of high mRNA concentration versus sufficiently low safe concentration.
– With a classic vaccine a certain controlled amount of covid spike protein itself would be injected. But with a mRNA viruslike agent vaccine the infected human cell plasma biochemistry produces the covid spike protein. This introduces risk factors for volatility in produced spike protein concentration in particular for high unsafe spike protein concentrations. To what extent such risk factors have been identified and tested? Such risk risk factors might be: variation in how much of the injected vaccine reaches which human tissue types, which human cell types are infected with how much covid spike mRNA, how much, how quick, how long do certain human cell types produce the covid spike protein, what are safe covid spike protein concentrations for different tissue types and for attacks of the immune system on those tissues, individual genetics and chronic disease history, ... .
– One example illustrating the above point is the possibility for the covid spike protein produced by mRNA infected cells to bind blood platelets and as such to be the cause of blood clots and thrombosis. See the following articles and video spoken in English en with Dutch subtitles:
* SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19
* Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns
* Covid: Dr. Bhakdi explains what mRNA or DNA vaccines could do in your body - Dutch subs - English voice
In the light of the above new and little tested risk-elements I want to point out the existence of:
– Oncoviruses, both DNA and RNA viruses, that cause cancer by mutating the cell nucleus DNA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncovirus
– Retroviruses that insert a copy of its RNA genome into the DNA of a host cell that it invades: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrovirus
– From RNA to DNA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_transcriptase
– From RNA to DNA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_transcriptase#Process_of_reverse_transcription
– From RNA to DNA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrotransposon
– DNA repair, thus modifying damaged DNA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_repair
And they will apply these new GMO viruslike agents on a massive scale on the world population as if they understand, control and have tested sufficiently these new GMO techniques and their consequences. Of course not, because the mysteries of life (DNA, RNA, biochemistry, the functioning of a cell, the development and functioning of a living being, ecosystems, … and all possible connections) are far from sufficiently understood.
Covid: Het PCR-doek valt - Peter Borger en Jorn Lukaszczyk
Some people argue that mRNA (Phizer, Moderna, ...) vaccines (actually viruslike agents) cannot impact or alter human cell DNA because the mRNA does not enter the cell nucleus. However as demonstrated above mRNA can be part of human cell DNA altering pathways. But then what about those other DNA vaccines (AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, Johnson & Johnson, …) that actually inject the covid spike DNA into the human cell nucleus containing the human DNA? See for example: How the Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Works. The established media likes to classify those vaccines as adenovirus vaccines without classifying them as DNA vaccines what they are in fact. The following new, little tested risk-elements stand out:
– Viruslike agents that enter and use the cell plasma and inject the covid spike DNA into the cell nucleus containing the human DNA.
– They use the cell plasma and cell nucleus with sufficiently high DNA concentration for a sufficient immune reaction.
– The potential conflicting interests of high DNA concentration versus sufficiently low safe concentration.
– With a classic vaccine a certain controlled amount of covid spike protein itself would be injected. But with a DNA viruslike agent vaccine the infected human cell plasma and nucleus biochemistry produces the covid spike protein. This introduces risk factors for volatility in produced spike protein concentration in particular for high unsafe spike protein concentrations. To what extent such risk factors have been identified and tested? Such risk risk factors might be: variation in how much of the injected vaccine reaches which human tissue types, which human cell types are infected with how much covid spike DNA, how much, how quick, how long do certain human cell types produce the covid spike protein, what are safe covid spike protein concentrations for different tissue types and for attacks of the immune system on those tissues, individual genetics and chronic disease history, ... .
– One example illustrating the above point is the possibility for the covid spike protein produced by DNA infected cells to bind blood platelets and as such to be the cause of blood clots and thrombosis. See the following articles and video spoken in English en with Dutch subtitles:
* SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19
* Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns
* Covid: Dr. Bhakdi explains what mRNA or DNA vaccines could do in your body - Dutch subs - English voice
Lets put the above little tested riks of mRNA and DNA vaccines in the context and perspective of healthy and young people. Because healthy people have a very low probability of dying from covid (see for example the table below with covid death probabilities for Belgium after about one year of covid per age category – an important proportion of the few deaths in this table probably go along with pre-existing disease), the advice to vaccinate those healthy people with these kind of vaccines, that invade and genetically manipulate our body cells into producing potentially volatile concentrations of covid spike protein and that have only been tested in the short term, is on the verge of the criminal for so many reasons one being people also die after covid vaccination. For example on 15 march 2021 according to VAERS in the USA 1913 reported deaths representing a death probability of 0,000018 after vaccination and probably also with pre-existing disease. All the death probabilities mentioned here are for illustration purpose only, not for determining or comparing a persons death probability because the categorisation is far too broad.
Age
|
Man
|
Woman
|
0-24
|
0,0000000
|
0,0000025
|
24-44
|
0,0000161
|
0,0000128
|
45-64
|
0,0002212
|
0,0001146
|
And very importantly, probably already the mucosal immune system of many healtly persons knocks out the covid virus not or hardly allowing it to infect your internal tissues or organs, whereas a mRNA or DNA vaccine is injected directly into this healthy persons body, bypassing the mucosal immune system, allowing the viruslike agents to infect the cells of your internal tissues and organs freely with the covid spike mRNA or DNA and as such to cause substantial immune attacks on those internal tissues and organs and even, although rare, permanent damage or death! In other words, the natural immunity of these healthy people is much better and safer than the vaccins.
Breaking (march 2021)! Analysing the figures of EudraVigilance, the European database of vaccination damages, the above vaccination situation appears to be disastrously worse for young and healthy people. I managed to estimate probabilities for reported adverse effects and death after vaccination by age category by combining the figures from EudraVigilance by age category, Belgian vaccinated people by age category and the total vaccinated EEA (European Economic Area) people. See the table below. Under the latter table I copied the above table of death probabilities after about one year of covid for comparison purpose.
Age
|
Reported Adverse Effect Estimated Probability
|
Death after Vaccination Estimated Probability
|
0-17
|
0,0046744
|
0,0000534
|
18-64
|
0,0037028
|
0,0000423
|
65-85
|
0,0008883
|
0,0000101
|
85+
|
0,0005378
|
0,0000061
|
All Ages
|
0,0023391
|
0,0000267
|
Age
|
Man
|
Woman
|
0-24
|
0,0000000
|
0,0000025
|
24-44
|
0,0000161
|
0,0000128
|
45-64
|
0,0002212
|
0,0001146
|
Whereas death probabilities after about one year of covid decrease with younger age to almost zero for young people, covid vaccination clearly shows the opposite trend with reported adverse effect probabilities and death probabilities increasing with younger age. The latter increase results in high reported adverse effect probabilities and death probabilities after covid vaccination that are:
– for the young extremely higher than the death probability after about one year of covid.
– for a lower age range of the middle aged substantially higher than the death probability after about one year of covid.
Update 2023-12-17. Reporting rates into adverse effect reporting systems are known to be 20 to 100 times less than reality for a variety of reasons. Therefore the above adverse effects and death after "vaccination" probabilities should be multiplied by a suitable factor. Lets say with 50. Today it is known that the covid deaths were higly exaggerated and many (elderly) people died not from covid an sich but from the covid killing protocols like forbidding early treatment with antivirals, minerals and vitamins, forbidding family to take care of their elderly, treatment with too high and long doses of remdesivir, midazolam, morfine, ... . Considering the underreported death rates after "vaccination" and overreported death rates from covid, probably no age category should have gotten a gentech covid "vaccine".
Because of disfunctional availability of the needed data to calculate the estimated probabilities I had to apply several shortcuts in the calculation which introduce certain assumptions about the domain. For example the Belgian vaccinated people distribution by age category was applied on the EEA as a whole. I'm confident that all of those assumptions are very plausible. Still if one or some of those assumptions would be far off target the estimated probabilities and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Therefore the estimates and trends are with reservation of the latter and of potential errors in the data used. This being said I want to point out that the trend of increasing vaccination damage probabilities with younger age can also easily be understood from the underlying data. See the screenshots (push ctrl+ to enlarge) of EudraVigilance in appendix A and the general knowledge that almost everywhere, as in Belgium, the elderly and vulnerable have priority for vaccination. Furthermore I find it uncomprehensible that the Ema, supposed to protect the health of all the people of all ages, did not publish up to now those vaccination damage probabilities by age category. Therefore I challenge the Ema to do so without applying the shortcuts I had to apply. And then we could peer review eachother.
I also strongly suspect that the execution of this worldwide mass vaccination agenda is not feasible and unrealistic in the short and long run because of the following:
– Currently on a worldwide scale the vaccination progress is too slow to slow down covid significantly. This is among others due to delays in vaccine supply.
– The antibodies after vaccination or after covid infection would apparently last a couple of months in the body. After their disappearance the direct antibodies immunity is gone. This probably implies that repeat vaccinations for 70% of the world population are needed each year maybe even multiple ones during the year and that the covid virus will never be sufficiently slowed down let alone eradicated by vaccination.
– No vaccine offers guarantee that somebody will not get covid. Some vaccines offer a pretty low protection up to only 60%. The latter means that 4 in 10 people will still develop covid after contagion after vaccination.
– There is no guarantee that the current vaccines will protect against any new variant of covid. If such a resistant variant is successful, again 70% of the world population ought to be vaccinated again.
– It seems covid is also succesful in other animal species. Will all those other animal species also be vaccinated multiple times each year? I think that is on its own totally not feasible.
Breaking! The current (april 2021) covid surge in highly mass vaccinated Chile (67 doses per 100 people) is among others being blamed on the low efficacy of the classic Sinovac vaccine which is probably true. But this is merely a prediction for what most probably is about to happen in the rest of the mass vaccinated world with vaccinnes with a higher efficacy (always < 100%) because more resistant variants like the South African one will take over. The slowness of putting jabs in arms is no match for the astronomical mutation speed of the virus!
Sadly Hungary, Serbia, Bhutan, Israel, the United Kingdom, Chile, the United States, ... chose covid mass vaccination instead of natural herd immunity with vaccination limited to the covid vulnerable. A natural way of living will enhance the already strong natural herd immunity of the healthy against covid by gentle aerosol natural vaccination. The natural herd immunity has already suppressed and will suppress the covid virus most probably sooner and better than mass vaccination with the sickening, damaging and killing viruslike mRNA and DNA vaccinnes bearing serious risks of worsening the herd immunity and virusses ecosystem balances as argued below.
See this open letter from Geert Vanden Bossche:
Why mass vaccinaton amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster
Viral immune escape threatens to play a catastrophic role in the covid mass vaccinated world. This originally relatively harmless virus, with a very low death percentage for the healthy and young, would probably develop into a seasonal virus with probably an even lower death percentage. But there is indeed the risk that far-reaching mass vaccination will disturb the latter natural process and be the cause of resistant and who knows more dangerous and more contagious variants by creating biological niches for those variants. My perception is that the rise of variants correlates with the increase of vaccinations. In the latter context viral immune escape for sure and ADE (antibody dependent enhancement), a phenomenon that makes the disease much worse, should be mentioned.
Although ADE is in general rather rare, it is a known issue with coronaviruses, it was an issue in the animal trials for SARS vaccines and it is associated with SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and severe covid itself. It seems to me that as more vaccinnes and different vaccine types are administered and as more covid variants are succesful the ADE risk increases. Therefore given all of the above it seems to me that this worldwide mass vaccination agenda is in fact, as the vaccines are, a haste and rush agenda, very dangerous and destined to become a failure.
In conclusion. Unless you have to fear covid because of old age or underlying illnesses, why would a healthy person be so foolish to repeatedly each year over again (maybe multiple times during the year) take a risky haste and rush vaccine (see paragraphs above) with antibodies limited to some months and no guarantee against new variants or even the current variants? Given all of the above it seems to me an illusion that mass vaccination will bring covid under control let alone eradicate covid.
And then there is of course the following to push those long-term and medium-term unsure vaccines down our throat:
The Many Totalitarian Covid Concepts and Measures
Vaccines can be very dangerous:
Damage caused by vaccination against Swine flu (Pandemrix)
The article ”The very Dubious Worldwide Covid and Mass Vaccination Agenda” was written by Paka Small – 2021/01/11.
Appendix A
Sources:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/4576-dead-199213-injuries-european-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-vaccines/
Phizer dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll
AstraZeneca dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll
Moderna dap.ema.europa.eu/analytics/saw.dll
|